Rick Baudé Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

Lee Olsen wrote:
------------------------
> Sure there is how did the tusk get shoved in the
> ground still no answer except that "it's been
> answered elsewhere."

Sorry, "interpreted" is not an answer, it is speculation. Again you have proven you didn't read the paper.

> > > rearranging the
> > > femur heads
> >
> > Same process that scattered the teeth and the
> rest
> > of the misplaced bones.
>
> Which was? Still nothing but dodge ball answers
> about the answer's in the papers/references blah,
> blah, blah.

The words "blah, blah" do not occur in any of the papers.

[...]
> > This is getting more bazar by the minute.
>
> No kidding

Quote where specialists used the words "blah, blah" in their discussions, those are laypeople's
terms for avoiding reading the papers by playing dodge ball. No kidding.

> > > > > And how did the tusk get
> jammed in
> > the
> > > > ground
> > > > > while the other one was lying
> on
> > its
> > > side?
> >
> > Easy. Read the references in the reference
> that
> > you keep snipping out.
>
> Which are?

How many times does a link have to be posted and snipped out? If you didn't do the follow up the first two times, there is no guarantee the third time will be the charm.

> > > The entire site was what was left after
> > humans got
> > > through carving up a mastodon.
> >
> > Nothing was carved up. Read the paper.
>
> I read the paper think of 'carved' as a synonym
> for dismantling the mastodon. Yeah, I know they
> didn't say that either.

So if it wasn't butchered or carved, think of the word 'bowl'. Now people should guess as to what you are thinking when you post misinformation?
"/www.nature.com/articles/nature22065?dom=pscau&src=syn
"Nothing about femur heads or teeth."

> > > Anvil stones,
> > > hammerstones,
> > > percussion points
> >
> > With no protein residues... no evidence for
> > hammerstones.
>
> Funny thing about proteins they break down over
> time.

Great answer Rick. So why did the Cerutti team test for them? Because the Cerutti team doesn't know what they are doing? Excellent! And if the enamel for the teeth broke down, the fractured teeth wouldn't be there, so that enamel didn't disappear and also should be embedded in the stone anvils as shown by the photos in the Nature paper and exhibits at the museum...or was that all Photo Shopped? And why didn't the possible proteins disappear on your so-called hand axes? Because they are younger than ca 130 kya? Got it!

[...]
> > Every question you have asked has been
> answered in
> > the literature you haven't read.
[...]
>
> Answer: hominids moved them around.

That isn't what the Cerutti team said in their Nature paper. Read the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (since you just proved you haven't yet). Also, how did these bones get moved around without hominins?
[isgenesishistory.com]

Mesozoic hominins scattered those too, then disappeared without leaving a trace, just like at Cerutti? What a coincidence. What did they look like?
[www.npr.org] Think of a synonym for 'roast'.