Khazar-khum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Where are those Clovis graveyards, Lee? Invisible,
> it seems.

Not as invisible as your references refuting these two papers (Posted previously):
"Alaska infants: C1b and B2
Anzick boy: D4h3b
Naia: D1
Kennewick Man: X2a and Y-chromosome Q-M3
Arlington Springs: B ( rejected, not able to replicate first result)"

For those who don't understand this paper and the connection that unites Clovis with all Native Americans [genomebiology.biomedcentral.com] or anything about DNA, then this informal talk explains it more for archaeologists and laypeople:
[www.academia.edu]

I will be looking forward, KK, to your peer-reviewed paper in the journal 'Genome Biology' refuting Haber et al. or when you are asked to give a talk at the next conference for Society for American Archaeology.

What remains invisible is DNA for Huey, Cerutti, and Calico, but not for Clovis, which is very visible for those with monitors that still function.