Khazar-khum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How you manage to miss the point every single time
> is an amazing talent of yours, Lee.

No one can refute your imagination.
Fabricating arguments based on imagination (read negative evidence arguments) is not science, it's story telling. And no matter how many times you snip that out and reply with a story or an accusation without attribution marks says everything about that kind of argument.

If you don't have any evidence, make up a story about disappearing DNA based on zeros...no bones, no artifacts, no fires, no flutes, no flakes, no nothing at 130 kya in the Americas and then argue nothing based on belief ad nauseam.

So just keep snipping and replacing nothing with imagination. Your accusation can be applied to anything you want to make up...no vampire DNA because they disappeared, no bigfoot DNA because they disappeared, no alien DNA, no vole people DNA` because they disappeared. Just keep ignoring this is a science forum.

"Scientific models and, in turn, theories, are built on evidence. If there is no evidence, then we are not in the realm of science. We may as well be telling stories to each other, and that's ok - storytelling is part of human nature - but it's not science."

Part One: The Myth of Clovis: East vs. West
Juliet E. Morrow
Central States Archaeological Journal, Vol. 52, No. 1 (JANUARY, 2005), pp. 51-54