Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors

November 19, 2019, 2:01 am UTC    
November 08, 2018 06:40PM
Rick Baudé Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nobody disputes that all Native Americans are
> descendants of their Siberian Forbearers.

"Native Americans"??? You really mean "Clovis" Native Americans.

...except Bradley and Stanford.
[www.amazon.com]
They are "nobody" in your opinion?

What we
> are saying is that there were hominids that got
> here first, and then went into extinction. Leaving
> no DNA behind.

[www.archaeology.org]
"The Friedkin toolkit has strong similarities to Clovis technology but no actual Clovis points. As a result, Waters says, many have taken to calling it “proto-Clovis.”
"many" meaning those who know what a genome is.

Saying something isn't evidence. That's an evidence-free story, a classic negative evidence story. Sort of like the excuse the dog ate my homework, err, I mean the dog ate the DNA, the dog ate the site reports, the dog ate the boats or the trail they came in on, the dog ate bigfoot, in fact the dog ate every bit of evidence except the story. They all just hung out at Buttermilk and Cerutti.

I almost forgot, Holen et al: “We have never felt that this one site would represent a paradigm shift." The dog ate the second site they can't find also.
Subject Author Posted

Origins of the first Americans: Before and after the Anzick genome

Lee Olsen November 04, 2018 12:03PM

Re: Origins of the first Americans: Before and after the Anzick genome

Lee Olsen November 08, 2018 10:47AM

Re: Origins of the first Americans: Before and after the Anzick genome

Rick Baudé November 08, 2018 01:25PM

Re: Origins of the first Americans: Before and after the Anzick genome

Lee Olsen November 08, 2018 06:40PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login