Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors

November 22, 2019, 8:28 am UTC    
November 06, 2019 02:49PM
Pistol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Hans,
>
> Wood, as we have seen was widely used in the first
> 6-7 dynasties, especially in burials. Now a
> reasonable person would accept that as they
> cleared away the Giza plateau, emptied out older
> mastabas and tombs to make way for the 4th
> dynasty, and if they came across suitable pieces
> of wood they would either use them (repurpose)
> like beams and such or perhaps planks... coffins
> I'm not so sure as we don't know what they did
> with the owners of those older tombs, I assume
> they were reburied somewhere... anyway the scraps
> not repurposed would, if they were burnable, be
> used as fire wood, but 200+ year old wood buried
> or used in a tomb isn't going to burn well and
> more than likely the wood they used to build with
> came via trade routes from all directions... you
> need to feed the workers (with fire), build boats,
> barges, cranes and living quarters, build coffins
> statues etc... and still build the pyramids, so my
> money is on imported wood for the finer things,
> acacia for fires with usable scraps thrown into
> the mix. When you look at the strata of c14 dates
> they show three separate and distinct age groups
> of wood-fibres (carbon) used for each Giza
> pyramid, the oldest combined belong to G2 and G1
> and G3 groups closely mirror each other. I don't
> believe wood was a scarce commodity, it was easily
> got by trade, something the Egyptians had been
> already doing for a 1000 years.
>
> One point to make in this discussion, the
> conventional dates are set not in stone but by
> Parker who needed them to be where they are to
> align to late period evidence of the Sothic
> calendar, he needed there to be two Lunar
> calendars as well an old and new, unfortunately
> Parker was somewhat discredited by Clagetts
> analysis, however because nobody has resolved the
> calendar issue Parker's views linger. This is why
> the c14 has been summarily dismissed because it
> would throw the dates off and we wouldn't want
> that to happen now would we. My view is Calendars
> have always changed especially at the collapse of
> rule, with the exception of the Hebrew Lunar
> calendar which predates Egypt according to them
> but has never changed.
>
> Best regards,
>
> B.A.Hokom

Yep the OK could be older I don't see as an actual problem with it being moved back. However the problem with dating has been found in other archaeological profile were then modified by Den. which is of course lacking in Egypt.
Subject Author Posted

The Improved High Chronology

Hermione October 29, 2019 04:16AM

Re: The Improved High Chronology

Chris Tedder November 05, 2019 01:03PM

Re: The Improved High Chronology

Pistol November 05, 2019 02:08PM

Re: The Improved High Chronology

cladking November 05, 2019 06:06PM

Release of research and data?

Hans November 05, 2019 09:54PM

Re: The Improved High Chronology

Hans November 05, 2019 09:59PM

Re: The Improved High Chronology

Hermione November 06, 2019 08:51AM

Re: The Improved High Chronology

cladking November 06, 2019 09:45AM

Re: The Improved High Chronology

Hans November 06, 2019 11:35AM

Re: The Improved High Chronology

Pistol November 06, 2019 02:31PM

Re: The Improved High Chronology

Hans November 06, 2019 02:49PM

Re: The Improved High Chronology

cladking November 06, 2019 04:33PM

Re: The Improved High Chronology

Hans November 06, 2019 04:38PM

Re: The Improved High Chronology

Warwick L Nixon November 07, 2019 03:44PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login