cladking Wrote:

> > Care to explain why you are contradicting
> yourself
>
> I don't really see that in the words but in any
> case I'm not responsible for the beliefs of the
> author. He says the source is IES Edwards also
> for whom I'm not responsible for beliefs.

Yet you cherry pick one part of what he says but ignore the rest? LOL
>
> This isn't about what I believe.

Yes it is you BELIEVE you can accurately translate the PT while in practice this has been falsified. You now BELIEVE you can pretend to ignore the FACT that your ideas have been shown - by an experiment you suggested - to not work. You believe incorrectly.
>
> Ultimately the question isn't what anyone today
> believes but rather what did the builders mean by
> "mr" and how the term originated.

Yes and how would you have any way to comment on that subject? Since you cannot read the language and a pitifully uneducated on its culture and religion?
>
> I believe the Pyramid Texts are very clear about
> the pyramid being steps, stairs, and a place
> (instrument) for the king to ascend and become
> the pyramid itself that he might live forever.

Yes a religion concept that you have dismissed without evidence. Again contradicting yourself. The AE cannot both be religious and non-religious at the same time.......

> Everyone has a different take on it and it's
> hardly impossible we're all wrong.

I'm sure we're not wrong but you are as has been demonstrated by the words meaning YOU MADE UP do not fit the PT.