Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors

December 15, 2019, 7:07 am UTC    
November 28, 2019 09:53PM
Pistol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> their data is too vague, the particles are not
> traveling at a constant speed nor are they coming
> from a single point, so to claim its like and
> x-ray of the pyramid core is misleading. When
> particles with long wave lengths, which are slower
> moving low energy particles (like muons) they
> interact with stationary particles (in this case
> stone) and they either get absorbed or they
> scatter in all directions. The panels they're
> using are set up to receive the particles on a
> flat surface, the assumption and principle
> involved is that the slowest and least densely
> area of exposure of the panels represent where the
> particles have interacted with more stone
> particles, and the area on the panel that receives
> the fastest and most particles suggests they have
> traveled through less stone particles. Unfortunate
> for them is that they are unable to determine
> where all their collected muons came from because
> unlike an x-ray they are not focused from a source
> onto the targets they are placing. Moreover, they
> are unable to image anything in lateral or
> profile, so they don't no how high within the
> structure or at what angle there anomaly exists,
> and why don't the panels show the known shafts? I
> doubt they will ever be allowed to drill based on
> their incomplete data. I think because of where
> they are showing the anomaly, which just happens
> to be above the grand gallery, that it's more
> likely the case that the gallery itself is
> shadowing a false positive. The only way to get a
> remotely accurate reading would be to set the
> panels against, end to end and directly under the
> ceiling of the grand gallery, instead they placed
> them on the gallery ramps at intervals.
>
> Best,
>
> B.A Hokom

Or perhaps - while I cannot image them doing so - the architects would have built something like the relieving chambers above the grand gallery.

I suspect they will drill into the suspected corridor which logically being found behind a known former entrance might actually be there!
Subject Author Posted

Presence of "hidden" chamber in GP confirmed by new scans? (Daily Grail: video, 06:41)

Hermione November 28, 2019 06:52AM

Re: Presence of "hidden" chamber in GP confirmed by new scans? (Daily Grail: video, 06:41)

cladking November 28, 2019 09:20AM

Still waiting for YOUR data and research to be released Cladking

Hans November 28, 2019 10:01AM

If we could stay on topic, please ...

Hermione November 29, 2019 04:23AM

Re: Presence of "hidden" chamber in GP confirmed by new scans? (Daily Grail: video, 06:41)

Hans November 28, 2019 10:05AM

Re: Presence of "hidden" chamber in GP confirmed by new scans? (Daily Grail: video, 06:41)

Pistol November 28, 2019 03:37PM

Re: Presence of "hidden" chamber in GP confirmed by new scans? (Daily Grail: video, 06:41)

Hans November 28, 2019 09:53PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login