Home Discussion Forums Papers Authors
 March 31, 2020, 6:30 am UTC
 August 28, 2008 12:18AM Registered: 15 years ago Posts: 6,511
Hi all ...

According to my thinking the angle of the second shaft should be and is ... 39.47 degrees

This makes the angle of seperation EXACTLY 7 degrees. Pretty neat actually.

Here are some figures from John Legon's site:

... This angle agrees closely with Gantenbrink's finding of 39° 36' 28" for the southern shaft, given a reported uncertainty of 1/5°; while the stated angle of 39° 7' 28" for the northern shaft is said to be uncertain within 2° at present, since only a short fractured section at the lower end could be measured.12 In view, however, of the axial position of the Queen's Chamber, the probability that the two shafts were intended to emerge at the same level on the north and south sides of the pyramid, and the fact that the horizontal sections at the lower ends are the same length, there is no reason to doubt that the northern shaft was constructed with the same angle of slope as the southern shaft, (Don Barone's inserted note: I have it at 39.47) in close agreement with the theoretical requirement. ...

Shafts from Queen's Chamber North South Mean
Angle of Slope, Petrie 37° 28' 38° 28' 37° 58'

Shafts from Queen's Chamber North South Mean
Angle of Slope, Gantenbrink 39° 7' 28" 39° 36' 28" 39° 22'

... While the King's Chamber was placed at the exact level in the Great Pyramid at which the diagonals of the horizontal cross-section measure 440 cubits, and equal the sides of base, the level of 131.5 cubits for the outlets of the shafts from the Queen's Chamber is that at which the diagonals of the cross-section measure exactly 330 cubits or 3/4 of the sides of base. Again, at the level of 154 cubits now obtained for the outlets of the shafts from the King's Chamber, the diagonals measure just 280 cubits, and equal the height of the Great Pyramid. It should be more obvious than ever, therefore, that the design of these shafts was determined by considerations of geometry, symmetry, and the desire for a coherent dimensional design, and had nothing to do with the conjectured astronomical alignments.

Shafts from King's Chamber North South Mean
Angle of Slope, Petrie 31° 33' 45° 14' 38° 23'

Shafts from King's Chamber North South Mean
Angle of Slope, Gantenbrink 32° 36' 45° 00' 38° 48'

I have it at 32.47 or 32 degrees 28.2 minutes. Within 7.8 minutes. Pretty accurate I should think.

Best
Don Barone

Cherry Picking - If you can't debate your opponents on the substance of the issue, crush them on the minor details.
Subject Author Posted

#### A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Don Barone August 23, 2008 10:50PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Don Barone August 23, 2008 11:51PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Ronald August 24, 2008 02:10AM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Don Barone August 24, 2008 09:31AM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Ronald August 24, 2008 04:23PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

archaeo August 24, 2008 10:40PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Ronald August 25, 2008 12:54AM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Hermione August 25, 2008 01:48AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo August 25, 2008 10:18AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Hermione August 25, 2008 11:11AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Don Barone August 25, 2008 11:51AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Hermione August 25, 2008 01:50PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Warwick L Nixon August 26, 2008 01:46PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Ronald August 25, 2008 01:50PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Hermione August 25, 2008 01:55PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Don Barone August 25, 2008 11:14PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Ronald August 26, 2008 04:29AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Chris Tedder August 26, 2008 06:25AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Don Barone August 26, 2008 07:17AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Rich August 26, 2008 08:18AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Ronald August 26, 2008 09:07AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Don Barone August 26, 2008 07:28PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

lobo-hotei August 27, 2008 12:42AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Don Barone August 27, 2008 09:12AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Warwick L Nixon August 27, 2008 12:35PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo August 28, 2008 03:24PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Ronald August 27, 2008 04:55PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Don Barone August 27, 2008 09:35PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Chris Tedder August 26, 2008 11:40AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Ogygos August 26, 2008 01:26PM

#### 99

Chris Tedder August 26, 2008 02:41PM

#### Re: 99

Ogygos August 29, 2008 01:23PM

#### Re: 99

Don Barone August 29, 2008 07:25PM

#### Re: 99

Monty J. Bowen August 31, 2008 07:02AM

#### Re: 99

Ronald September 02, 2008 06:06AM

#### Re: 99

archaeo September 02, 2008 09:44AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Ronald August 26, 2008 09:20AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo August 26, 2008 01:17PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Don Barone August 27, 2008 10:48PM

#### A second angle looked at

Don Barone August 28, 2008 12:18AM

#### Re: A second angle looked at

archaeo August 28, 2008 03:07PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Don Barone August 28, 2008 07:59AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo August 28, 2008 02:54PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Don Barone August 28, 2008 09:19PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo August 29, 2008 10:02AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Khazar-khum August 29, 2008 11:04PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo August 30, 2008 09:44AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Warwick L Nixon August 30, 2008 11:50AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Khazar-khum August 30, 2008 03:45PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo August 31, 2008 11:37PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Khazar-khum September 01, 2008 10:33AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo September 01, 2008 12:00PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Warwick L Nixon September 01, 2008 12:09PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo September 01, 2008 12:19PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Warwick L Nixon September 01, 2008 12:25PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo September 02, 2008 09:37AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Warwick L Nixon September 02, 2008 09:49AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Don Barone August 28, 2008 02:26PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Khazar-khum August 29, 2008 10:58PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo August 30, 2008 10:05AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Warwick L Nixon August 30, 2008 11:54AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Khazar-khum August 30, 2008 03:51PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo August 31, 2008 11:41PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Khazar-khum September 01, 2008 10:38AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Warwick L Nixon September 01, 2008 11:25AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo September 01, 2008 12:12PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Warwick L Nixon September 01, 2008 12:23PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Khazar-khum September 01, 2008 03:53PM

#### **Moderation note**

Hermione September 01, 2008 04:04PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo September 01, 2008 12:04PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Warwick L Nixon September 01, 2008 12:12PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo September 01, 2008 12:21PM

#### Last Word

Warwick L Nixon September 01, 2008 12:27PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Khazar-khum September 01, 2008 03:56PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Hermione September 01, 2008 04:06PM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

archaeo September 02, 2008 09:40AM

Hermione September 02, 2008 09:51AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Monty J. Bowen August 31, 2008 07:43AM

#### Re: A Possible Hypothesis at Giza

Colette September 01, 2008 09:35PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Ogygos August 26, 2008 01:27AM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Ogygos August 26, 2008 01:44AM

#### which planet?

Ogygos August 26, 2008 02:53AM

#### Re: which planet?

Ogygos August 26, 2008 03:19AM

#### Re: which planet?

Ronald August 27, 2008 01:14AM

#### Re: which planet?

Ogygos August 27, 2008 08:37AM

#### Re: which planet?

Hermione August 27, 2008 09:05AM

#### Re: which planet?

Ronald August 27, 2008 04:05PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

C Wayne Taylor August 31, 2008 12:42PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Don Barone August 31, 2008 07:48PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Ogygos September 01, 2008 02:13AM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Don Barone September 01, 2008 06:57AM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Don Barone August 31, 2008 08:35PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Jon_B September 01, 2008 03:21PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Don Barone September 01, 2008 06:26PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Rob Miller September 05, 2008 02:06PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Don Barone September 01, 2008 06:59PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Martin Stower September 05, 2008 01:10PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Don Barone August 31, 2008 08:55PM

#### Re: A Possible Breakthrough at Giza

Khazar-khum September 01, 2008 10:40AM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.