Clive Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Khazar-khum Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > But that doesn't answer the Big Question
> here.
> >
> > Can you provide any proof at all that the
> 4th
> > Dynasty AE measured in degrees? Can you
> provide
> > any proof that AE ever measured anything in
> > degrees?
>
>
> Khazar:
> Now we are discussing on an intellectual level...
>
> What has been presented cannot be altered because
> it's there looking at us, it is a simple
> mathematical fact...
>
> What we "do" know of ancient times is the division
> of a circle into 360 part became a function of
> mathematics...that's a fact also.
>
> What we "do not" know for certain is when that
> event actually occurred and who were the
> designers...another fact.
>
> To state, "as a fact", the "oldest known" record
> of a 360 degrees circle as being the "initial" use
> is nonsense because it had to be known and used
> before it was ever recorded...right?
>
> The "illogical" statement is to claim that the
> pyramid builders "didn't" use a circle of 360
> degrees because we have no "written" evidence, yet
> claim the assumed theories of Egyptologists as
> true without written evidence.
>
> It is claimed that the two upper chambers of the
> Great pyramid were built for the king and his
> queen, yet there is not one/single/uno/1 piece of
> written evidence to prove it true.
> You can't have it both ways in this game.
>
> No written evidence of math and no written
> evidence of burial...therefore neither
> existed...that's logical isn't it?
>
> And if you believe that an empty stone coffin is
> evidence of a burial then you have assumed the
> stone container as a repository for a deceased
> individual...without proof. And you must provide a
> reason why all of these stone containes were void
> of bodies...is it possible that was not their
> intended function?
> I need an intellectual answer on that one...a
> possible yes or a definite no.
> Answer here......yes...no.
>
> As they say...facts speak volumes...and they also
> say an illustration is worthy of a thousand
> words.
> Soooo...the builders chose the easy route...they
> elected to illustrate.
>
> Returning to the 360:
> Now that I have provided a mathematical
> association of pi and the location of the Kc it
> "indicates" a "high" possibility of the builders
> being aware of and using a circle divided into 360
> segments.
> To claim this being false requires the input of an
> unbiased mathematician who is verse in
> "probabilities" and it will be discovered that it
> indicates, "without question", that the AE
> understood the number pi and used a 360 degrees
> circle. Unfortunately, my friend here in town
> confirms it true, but his association with me
> makes it biased.
>
> For me to continuously struggle with the,
> non-mathematician, non-believer or die-hard gets
> us nowhere. It's a futile and pointless battle
> between...I'm right...you're wrong.
>
> > You can measure it in hands, inches or Hobbit
> feet
> > for all I care. What you MUST prove is--did
> they?
>
> I hope you now understand the futility of this
> question.
> “Read” the following topic to the "very" end then
> get back to me...I'll be happy to assist in
> anything you question.
In other words, not only are you incapable of proving it--you aren't even going to attempt proving it.