Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors

December 9, 2019, 4:42 pm UTC    
March 23, 2016 07:53PM
Byrd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cladking Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The ancient language
> > was highly context dependent and this is why
> it
> > hasn't been understood.
>
> English isn't an ancient language.

English isn't at all context dependent. Since it isn't we don't notice how important context and perspective are to effective communication. In English each word is deciphered in real time as it is heard or read. Each word in a sentence must be assigned one of its many meanings in order for it to make sense. We assume in advance the other party has the same experience, perspective, and understanding of word meaning. But it all breaks down because none of these things ever apply. Every word and each of its meanings has slightly different or very different meaning to each user. We assume a shared perspective because we look at things from infinite distance from the outside though because of experience we often have different points of view.

We are so accustomed to deconstructing what people say or write we can't even imagine a language that can't be deconstructed. We can't imagine a language where people didn't just say what they mean. We can't imagine a language that was not only literal but was consistent with nature and logic. We read that after the purification marked by the rainbows that tefnut used her arms to make the earth high under the sky. This makes no sense to us so we assume it has no relevance to reality but is religious in nature. Across the board it's the same thing. They said what they meant in plain English but it makes no sense to us because our perspective is different and because we automatically deconstruct each word.

They saw the world from the inside and they assigned human characteristics to everything. They wouldn't (couldn't) say something like "the sun in its current manifestation that derives from its prior state causes a rainbow which results from his ability to manipulate at a distance".".

This is because language and the rules of grammar necessitated that context be established through known theory. Without a tie to reality no words had any meaning at all.

1587d. Thou comest into being, in thy name of "Khepri.*"
1588a. Greetings to thee, eye of Horus, which he adorned with his two hands completely.

In every instance a perspective is defined and then the meaning exists within that context.

Rainbows simply permeate the Pyramid Texts. But then due to the nature of the language, so too, does everything else.

Horus truly was the Lord of the Land of Rainbows.

1244a. To say: Rē‘ purified himself for thee; Horus adorned himself for thee,





*Khepri is the scientific axiom that all things had a cause. It is represented in Egyptian by the beatle which laid its eggs in dung and by the midday sun which they knew was the same sun day after day by observing sunspots at dawn and sunset.

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.
Subject Author Posted

Arris angle

RLH July 03, 2009 10:03AM

Re: Arris angle

RLH July 05, 2009 07:31AM

Re: Arris angle

cladking July 13, 2009 09:21PM

Re: Arris angle

Greg Reeder July 14, 2009 11:08AM

Re: Arris angle

cladking July 14, 2009 01:48PM

Re: Arris angle

Greg Reeder July 14, 2009 02:52PM

Re: Arris angle

cladking July 14, 2009 05:48PM

Re: Arris angle

cladking July 14, 2009 08:25PM

Maybe you are on to something?

Greg Reeder July 14, 2009 10:34PM

Re: Maybe you are on to something?

cladking July 16, 2009 11:42PM

Re: Maybe you are on to something?

cladking July 21, 2009 12:39AM

Re: Maybe you are on to something?

Greg Reeder July 21, 2009 10:41AM

Re: Maybe you are on to something?

cladking July 21, 2009 01:57PM

imho CK, you are being too literal again

Jammer July 22, 2009 07:45AM

Re: imho CK, you are being too literal again

cladking July 23, 2009 08:05PM

Re: Maybe you are on to something?

Ogygos July 22, 2009 11:45AM

Re: Maybe you are on to something?

Jammer July 23, 2009 01:05PM

Re: Maybe you are on to something?

Ogygos July 23, 2009 05:41PM

Re: Maybe you are on to something?

Jammer July 24, 2009 09:47AM

Re: Maybe you are on to something?

cladking July 28, 2009 11:17PM

No rainbow here but careful of the angle.

cladking August 09, 2009 02:07PM

Re: No rainbow here but careful of the angle.

cladking August 09, 2009 02:21PM

It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 03, 2009 12:14AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 03, 2009 07:37PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Warwick L Nixon September 04, 2009 01:15PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 04, 2009 08:57PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Warwick L Nixon September 06, 2009 10:20AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 06, 2009 12:44PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Greg Reeder September 06, 2009 12:57PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 06, 2009 02:49PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Greg Reeder September 06, 2009 03:11PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 06, 2009 05:42PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Hermione September 07, 2009 08:18AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 07, 2009 11:09AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Hermione September 07, 2009 11:50AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Greg Reeder September 07, 2009 12:44PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 07, 2009 08:19PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Warwick L Nixon September 09, 2009 12:00PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 09, 2009 12:44PM

Paradigm shift alert

Warwick L Nixon September 09, 2009 01:43PM

Re: Paradigm shift alert

cladking September 09, 2009 04:26PM

Re: Paradigm shift alert

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2009 09:51AM

Re: Paradigm shift alert

Don Barone September 10, 2009 11:15AM

Re: Paradigm shift alert

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2009 11:56AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 07, 2009 08:06PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Hermione September 08, 2009 04:32AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 08, 2009 11:09AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 07, 2009 08:45PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 09, 2009 12:00PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Warwick L Nixon September 09, 2009 12:17PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 09, 2009 12:48PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Warwick L Nixon September 09, 2009 01:37PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 09, 2009 04:42PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Tommi Huhtamaki September 09, 2009 05:03PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 09, 2009 05:50PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2009 10:02AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 10, 2009 10:33AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2009 10:41AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 10, 2009 11:12AM

Okay

Warwick L Nixon September 10, 2009 12:09PM

Re: Okay

cladking September 10, 2009 08:05PM

Re: Okay

Warwick L Nixon September 11, 2009 12:25PM

Re: Okay

cladking September 11, 2009 01:00PM

Re: Okay

Warwick L Nixon September 11, 2009 01:27PM

Re: Okay

cladking September 11, 2009 03:39PM

Re: Okay

Warwick L Nixon September 12, 2009 12:23PM

Re: Okay

cladking September 13, 2009 12:41PM

Re: Okay

Warwick L Nixon September 13, 2009 02:51PM

Re: Okay

cladking September 13, 2009 04:27PM

Re: Okay

Warwick L Nixon September 14, 2009 11:45AM

Re: Okay

cladking September 14, 2009 03:55PM

Re: Okay

Warwick L Nixon September 16, 2009 10:02AM

Re: Okay

cladking September 16, 2009 06:26PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking April 28, 2010 12:34PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Hermione September 09, 2009 02:40PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 09, 2009 05:00PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Tommi Huhtamaki September 09, 2009 05:25PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking March 25, 2016 01:01PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 15, 2009 08:33PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Warwick L Nixon September 16, 2009 10:32AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 16, 2009 04:51PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Warwick L Nixon September 17, 2009 09:35AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 17, 2009 01:32PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 17, 2009 01:55PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Warwick L Nixon September 18, 2009 09:48AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking September 18, 2009 10:22AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Warwick L Nixon September 18, 2009 11:14AM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

cladking March 10, 2010 11:53PM

Re: It ascends from earth and orders the lights above.

Hermione May 26, 2010 01:18AM

Re: Maybe you are on to something?

cladking September 09, 2009 12:13PM

Re: Maybe you are on to something?

cladking October 08, 2009 11:41PM

Re: Arris angle

Warwick L Nixon July 15, 2009 10:55AM

Re: Arris angle

cladking August 01, 2009 08:29PM

Lord of the Rainbows.

cladking August 12, 2009 11:07PM

Re: Lord of the Rainbows.

cladking February 13, 2010 08:42PM

Re: Lord of the Rainbows.

Warwick L Nixon February 15, 2010 01:47PM

Re: Lord of the Rainbows.

cladking February 15, 2010 05:56PM

Re: Lord of the Rainbows.

Jammer February 22, 2010 11:24AM

Re: Lord of the Rainbows.

cladking February 22, 2010 04:03PM

perhaps I wasn't clear enough

Warwick L Nixon February 22, 2010 01:07PM

Re: perhaps I wasn't clear enough

cladking February 22, 2010 03:43PM

nuff said

Warwick L Nixon February 24, 2010 12:09PM

Re: Arris angle

cladking March 10, 2016 08:26PM

Re: Arris angle

cladking March 20, 2016 10:00AM

Re: Arris angle

Byrd March 23, 2016 06:46PM

Re: Arris angle

cladking March 23, 2016 07:53PM

Re: Arris angle

cladking March 28, 2016 10:35AM

Re: Arris angle

cladking April 26, 2016 01:41PM

Re: Arris angle

cladking May 07, 2016 08:29PM

Re: Arris angle

Warwick L Nixon July 14, 2009 12:38PM

Re: Arris angle

cladking July 14, 2009 01:49PM

Re: Arris angle

Hermione July 14, 2009 01:54PM

I Q test?

Warwick L Nixon July 14, 2009 02:36PM

Re: Arris angle

RLH July 15, 2009 11:06AM

Re: Arris angle

cladking July 16, 2009 11:34PM

Re: Arris angle

cladking January 09, 2019 10:03PM

Your ideas destroyed by questions you could not answer

Hans January 21, 2019 02:37PM

Re: Your ideas destroyed by questions you could not answer

cladking January 22, 2019 02:22PM

Re: Your ideas destroyed by questions you could not answer

cladking January 23, 2019 09:31AM

Question

Hans January 25, 2019 07:30PM

Re: Question

cladking January 27, 2019 11:05AM

Re: Question

Hermione January 27, 2019 01:33PM

Re: Question

cladking January 27, 2019 03:15PM

Oh my!

Hans January 27, 2019 08:51PM

Re: Oh my!

cladking January 27, 2019 09:57PM

Thanks for the amusement

Hans January 27, 2019 10:11PM

...and you avoided the questions.

Hans January 27, 2019 08:47PM

Re: ...and you avoided the questions.

cladking January 27, 2019 10:03PM

Still trying to avoid the question...amazing

Hans January 27, 2019 10:16PM

Re: Still trying to avoid the question...amazing

cladking January 28, 2019 09:49AM

No answers provide - so bye bye

Hans January 28, 2019 12:49PM

Re: No answers provide - so bye bye

cladking January 28, 2019 01:04PM

Again no answers - just avoidance - questions asked for the last time

Hans January 28, 2019 04:54PM

Re: Again no answers - just avoidance - questions asked for the last time

cladking January 28, 2019 05:55PM

Re: Arris angle

Clive July 16, 2009 11:35PM

Re: Arris angle

RLH July 17, 2009 04:04PM

Re: Arris angle

Don Barone July 17, 2009 09:50AM

Re: Arris angle

RLH July 17, 2009 04:05PM

Re: Arris angle

Don Barone July 18, 2009 06:33AM

Re: Arris angle

Mark Heaton March 17, 2010 02:21AM

Re: Arris angle

Don Barone March 11, 2016 08:17PM

Addendum to Re: Arris angle

Don Barone March 12, 2016 08:05AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login