Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors

September 25, 2020, 11:08 pm UTC    
June 03, 2010 12:47AM
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> It's ramps that are unevidenced.

Saying it over and over isn't going to make ramps disappear.

> I have proof
> they had water at the pyramid base which is the
> same thing you have for ramps.

Again a huge 13 acre based pyramid funnels water to the bottomo edges so duh, there is water evidence at the edge. Unfortunately for you you can't prove it was put there in the process of building the pyramid.

No need to regurgitate the same ol' lame lies. You have admitted you have no real evidence only wishful belief.

> But there are some
> huge differences. We know how the ramps got there
> and there's no known way for large amounts of
> flowing water to get there.

Don't limit everyone else with your limits of knowledge. Rain over 4500 years is alot of water. Even a half inch light rain would, across surface of the GP, direct a hair less then 72079 gallons of water to the bottom edges of the pyramid base.That's alot of buckets!


> ROFL. 20-40 guys eh? So when they get to the top
> they only have to make the trip another 2,499,999
> times.

Knowing you you probably believe this too.

Workforce of 40,000 with 40 men teams(article showed way less) that would be about 2500 trips for each team. Over 20 years that would be about 125 a year. On a 4 month a year timeframe that would be 1 pull a day.
you want to cut it to half the workforce available for pulling then that makes it 2 loads a day.

Wait let's make it only 10,000 men available for the pulling teams that makes it 4 loads a day. But wait if we use the 20 men teams instead of 40 we would get 2 loads a day again.

Of course looking at the article where it only took 10 volunteers to move a 13 ton load(8 on top and two to act as brakemen) up a 25% grade then we could have them taking 2 loads a day and working only half the days.

> That sounds like a cake walk.

Yes it does. My team would have lots of hour long breaks drinking beer, thinking of your water brigades on constant lift detail, and laughing constantly in the shade of the pyramid.

> Let's see
> 20 times that is a mere 50,000,000 man trips.

You suck at this math. Read above.

> Have you ever dragged a 2 1/2 ton stone up a half
> mile ramp even once? Was it 110 degrees with the
> sun reflecting off surfaces on all sides?

Have you? Have you ever hoisted buckets of water like your bucket brigade would have to do since their is absolutely zero, real evidence to support make believe geysers.

I did push a VW rabbit(1800lbs) up, and over, 4 hills in a span of 2.5(approx) miles to a gas station because the young girl(100lbs) who owned it forgot to fill up before we left. It was early September in Texas. That means close enough to 110 to not matter.

So 1 person pushing almost a ton alone. Tires, smooth road were all a great help but a 2 ton block on a sled on a lubricated channel would be easy to move with very few people. Again read the article.
13 tons by 8 people with possibly 2 more to act as brakes on the 25% grade.


> Shouldn't you be concerned with the evidence
> though?

There is one person here who has never been concerned with real evidence, you!


> Then why did they build a water collection device
> around the pyramid and use canals to transport
> water to the cliff face.

You haven't proven any of this so quit stating as fact. IF it was such a system, runoff during rains, morning dews, etc. is more probable then a leaking bullbutt contraption.

> These canals are wholly
> inadequate handle even a light rainfall yet they
> still saw cause to build two of them.

Show us YOUR maths that prove this statement you have made is true.

> > Your non-educated made up belief of an
> > interpretation of the PTs is comparable to
> Santa
> > claus, easter bunny, and tooth fairy.
>
>
> It is rather fantastic is it not? Perhaps this is
> why the obvious was overlooked.

More likely it was dismissed due to lack of evidence and being unrealistic for the culture at the time in question.

Of course here is where evidence is supposed to be weighed, not troll fantasies.


Lobo-hotei
lobo

Treat the earth well, It was not given to you by your parents, It was loaned to you by your children.
Native American Proverb
Subject Author Posted

Cenotes and pyramids.

cladking May 25, 2010 11:21AM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

Warwick L Nixon May 25, 2010 11:27AM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

Byrd May 25, 2010 12:34PM

Emerald Tablet

Hermione May 25, 2010 01:02PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

cladking May 25, 2010 03:33PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Byrd May 25, 2010 06:59PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

cladking May 25, 2010 07:26PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Khazar-khum June 01, 2010 06:18PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

cladking June 01, 2010 06:56PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 07:05PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

cladking June 01, 2010 07:16PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 07:41PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

cladking June 01, 2010 07:52PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 08:06PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

cladking June 01, 2010 08:17PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 08:25PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Jammer June 02, 2010 10:06AM

Re: Emerald Tablet

cladking June 02, 2010 10:36AM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Hermione June 12, 2010 07:43AM

Re: Emerald Tablet

cladking June 12, 2010 10:44AM

Re: Emerald Tablet

cladking June 12, 2010 09:23PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Greg Reeder June 12, 2010 10:03PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Khazar-khum June 12, 2010 10:07PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

cladking June 12, 2010 10:16PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Byrd June 02, 2010 11:23AM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Hermione October 04, 2017 09:37AM

Re: Emerald Tablet

cladking October 25, 2017 12:33PM

Re: Emerald Tablet

Warwick L Nixon December 08, 2017 02:22PM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

cladking May 25, 2010 03:31PM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

Anthony May 26, 2010 07:27AM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

Hermione May 26, 2010 09:49AM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

Anthony May 26, 2010 10:01AM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

cladking May 26, 2010 11:15AM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

Warwick L Nixon May 26, 2010 01:18PM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

Hermione May 26, 2010 01:35PM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

cladking May 26, 2010 04:56PM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

Sirfiroth May 26, 2010 10:23PM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

cladking May 26, 2010 11:18PM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

Byrd May 26, 2010 02:47PM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

cladking May 26, 2010 04:58PM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

Byrd May 27, 2010 05:12PM

Re: Cenotes and pyramids.

cladking May 27, 2010 05:21PM

A little?

Anthony May 28, 2010 05:38AM

Re: A little?

cladking May 28, 2010 04:16PM

r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Jammer June 01, 2010 10:00AM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 10:37AM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Jammer June 01, 2010 11:05AM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 11:20AM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 11:44AM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 11:55AM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 12:01PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 12:11PM

Clad da Vinci???

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 06:02PM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

cladking June 01, 2010 07:11PM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

lobo-hotei June 02, 2010 01:08AM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

cladking June 02, 2010 10:58AM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

Jammer June 02, 2010 11:26AM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

lobo-hotei June 02, 2010 12:30PM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2010 12:43PM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

cladking June 02, 2010 01:47PM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

cladking June 02, 2010 01:46PM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

cladking June 02, 2010 01:44PM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

lobo-hotei June 02, 2010 12:22PM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

cladking June 02, 2010 01:59PM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

lobo-hotei June 03, 2010 12:47AM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

Jammer June 02, 2010 10:58AM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

cladking June 02, 2010 11:08AM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

Jammer June 02, 2010 11:33AM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

cladking June 02, 2010 02:11PM

Jammer...

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2010 02:31PM

Re: Jammer...

cladking June 02, 2010 02:40PM

Re: Jammer...

lobo-hotei June 03, 2010 12:50AM

Re: Jammer...

Jammer June 03, 2010 09:18AM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

lobo-hotei June 02, 2010 12:46PM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

cladking June 02, 2010 02:27PM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

lobo-hotei June 03, 2010 01:21AM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

cladking June 03, 2010 11:05AM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

Jammer June 03, 2010 11:53AM

Re: Clad da Vinci???

cladking June 03, 2010 04:03PM

Difficulties of translating religious texts

Hermione June 03, 2010 11:59AM

Re: Difficulties of translating religious texts

Anthony June 03, 2010 01:08PM

Re: Difficulties of translating religious texts

Warwick L Nixon June 03, 2010 01:24PM

Brilliant quote...

Anthony June 03, 2010 06:38PM

Re: Brilliant quote...

cladking June 03, 2010 06:46PM

Re: Brilliant quote...

cladking June 03, 2010 06:49PM

Re: Brilliant quote...

Sirfiroth June 03, 2010 07:48PM

Re: Brilliant quote...

cladking June 03, 2010 08:14PM

Re: Brilliant quote...

Warwick L Nixon June 03, 2010 07:47PM

Re: Brilliant quote...

Anthony June 03, 2010 08:26PM

Re: Brilliant quote...

cladking June 03, 2010 08:29PM

Re: Brilliant quote...

cladking June 03, 2010 08:28PM

to this I must reluctantly respond

Warwick L Nixon June 03, 2010 09:47PM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

cladking June 03, 2010 10:41PM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

Warwick L Nixon June 03, 2010 11:09PM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

cladking June 03, 2010 11:32PM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

Warwick L Nixon June 03, 2010 11:58PM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

cladking June 04, 2010 12:27AM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

Warwick L Nixon June 04, 2010 12:36AM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

Khazar-khum June 12, 2010 07:01PM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

cladking June 12, 2010 09:36PM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

Khazar-khum June 12, 2010 09:57PM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

cladking June 12, 2010 10:13PM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

Khazar-khum June 13, 2010 01:57AM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

cladking June 13, 2010 10:39AM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

Tommi Huhtamaki June 13, 2010 10:51AM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

cladking June 13, 2010 11:50AM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

Tommi Huhtamaki June 13, 2010 12:09PM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

cladking June 13, 2010 05:02PM

imho this is a waste of all our valuable time...

Jammer June 13, 2010 02:42PM

Re: imho this is a waste of all our valuable time...

cladking June 13, 2010 04:08PM

Re: imho this is a waste of all our valuable time...

Jammer June 14, 2010 11:49AM

to this I must reluctantly respond

Jammer June 13, 2010 07:28AM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

cladking June 13, 2010 11:25AM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

Jammer June 13, 2010 02:33PM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

cladking June 13, 2010 04:31PM

Re: to this I must reluctantly respond

Khazar-khum June 13, 2010 02:36PM

Re: Brilliant quote...

Hermione June 04, 2010 03:32AM

Re: Difficulties of translating religious texts

cladking June 03, 2010 04:12PM

Re: Difficulties of translating religious texts

cladking June 03, 2010 04:10PM

Re: Difficulties of translating religious texts

Hermione June 03, 2010 04:21PM

Re: Difficulties of translating religious texts

cladking June 03, 2010 04:26PM

Re: Difficulties of translating religious texts

Hermione June 03, 2010 04:34PM

Citation problem

Anthony June 03, 2010 12:58PM

Re: Citation problem

Warwick L Nixon June 03, 2010 01:17PM

Re: Citation problem

cladking June 03, 2010 04:14PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Jammer June 01, 2010 12:09PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 06:26PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 07:12PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 07:32PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 12:02PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 12:03PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Jammer June 01, 2010 12:18PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 01:12PM

Since you ask...

Anthony June 01, 2010 02:19PM

Re: Since you ask...

cladking June 01, 2010 05:06PM

Re: Since you ask...

Khazar-khum June 01, 2010 06:28PM

Re: Since you ask...

cladking June 01, 2010 07:25PM

Re: Since you ask...

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 07:44PM

Re: Since you ask...

Khazar-khum June 02, 2010 03:15PM

Ummm... hello?

Anthony June 02, 2010 10:26AM

Re: Ummm... hello?

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2010 10:50AM

Oops

cladking June 02, 2010 11:10AM

Oops

Jammer June 02, 2010 11:39AM

Re: Oops

cladking June 02, 2010 02:39PM

Re: Oops

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2010 02:57PM

Re: Oops

Hermione June 02, 2010 03:16PM

Re: Oops

cladking June 02, 2010 03:28PM

Re: Oops

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2010 03:49PM

Re: Oops

cladking June 02, 2010 04:18PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Rebby June 01, 2010 02:42PM

your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Jammer June 01, 2010 03:13PM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 05:29PM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Jammer June 02, 2010 11:41AM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2010 01:02PM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 02, 2010 02:42PM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Jammer June 03, 2010 09:32AM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 03, 2010 04:33PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 05:09PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Rebby June 01, 2010 05:25PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 05:37PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Rebby June 01, 2010 09:07PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 10:11PM

your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Jammer June 02, 2010 11:48AM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 02, 2010 02:48PM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 02, 2010 03:02PM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 02, 2010 07:07PM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 02, 2010 07:17PM

The Pyramids and Temples of Geyser

Anthony June 02, 2010 08:56PM

Re: The Pyramids and Temples of Geyser

cladking June 02, 2010 09:21PM

Re: The Pyramids and Temples of Geyser

Jammer June 03, 2010 09:45AM

Re: The Pyramids and Temples of Geyser

cladking June 03, 2010 04:21PM

Re: The Pyramids and Temples of Geyser

Hermione June 03, 2010 04:23PM

Re: The Pyramids and Temples of Geyser

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2010 09:49PM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Rick Baudé June 02, 2010 11:40PM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 03, 2010 12:42AM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

lobo-hotei June 03, 2010 01:34AM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Hermione June 03, 2010 01:37AM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 03, 2010 04:42PM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Anthony June 03, 2010 06:32PM

Re: your sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 03, 2010 06:42PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 10:46AM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 05:34PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 05:45PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 06:18PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 07:30PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 08:04PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

cladking June 01, 2010 08:21PM

Re: r sense of logical debate fails you with this oft repeated mantra!

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 08:34PM

Pyramids and Turnips...

Jammer June 14, 2010 12:09PM

Re: Pyramids and Turnips...

Jammer June 14, 2010 12:31PM

**Moderation note**

Hermione June 14, 2010 12:57PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login