Blog

This review article first appeared in: Skeptical Adversaria 3 (2008), 7-8 Reproduced with permission Minerva, named for

This review article first appeared in: Skeptical Adversaria 2 (2009), 9 Reproduced with permission Amorey Gethin is

This article first appeared on the Association for Skeptical Enquiry (ASKE) site. Reproduced with permission New research

This article first appeared on the Association for Skeptical Enquiry (ASKE) site. Reproduced with permission Re evidence

This article first appeared on the Association for Skeptical Enquiry (ASKE) site. Reproduced with permission Milan Elisin,

This article first appeared on the Association for Skeptical Enquiry (ASKE) site. Reproduced with permission Daniel Hopkins

This article first appeared on the Association for Skeptical Enquiry (ASKE) site. Reproduced with permission Various authors

This review article first appeared in: Skeptical Adversaria 2 (2009), 9-10 Reproduced with permission The ‘epigraphist’ writer

This review article first appeared in: Skeptical Adversaria 4 (2008), 5-6 Reproduced with permission Linguists differ as

This review article first appeared in: Skeptical Adversaria 1 (2009), 4-8 Reproduced with permission Michael Tsarion is

ASSAP News 128 (Winter 2009-10), 11; Skeptical Adversaria 1 (2010), 4-6 Reproduced with permission During the 20th Century,

http://www.aske-skeptics.org.uk/ (2010) Quite frequently I am contacted (usually emailed) by amateur ‘linguists’ seeking approval for their

This article first appeared on the Association for Skeptical Enquiry (ASKE) site. Reproduced with permission Many readers

This article originally appeared in Vol 17, No 3 THE SKEPTICReproduced with permission In this paper

Inner Traditions, Rochester (VT, USA)2006 xv + 208 This article first appeared in The Skeptical Intelligencer 10

CONVENTION PAPER Reproduced with permission Summary of original paper (the Skeptic 17:3): David Oates claims